Publication

The second year of the National Human Rights Strategy implementation: what has changed?

On April 12, the roundtable “The Second Year of the National Human Rights Strategy Implementation: What Has Changed?” was held at America House Kyiv.

The Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, the Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights, the international technical assistance project “Participant Training Program” with the support of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) within the Human Rights in Action project organized the event.

Representatives of state administration bodies, international and non-governmental organizations, attended the event.

Arkadiy Bushchenko
Arkadiy Bushchenko

Arkadiy Bushchenko, Executive Director of UHHRU, said that the public interest is to identify factors that prevent the effective implementation of the National Strategy and Action Plan.

“We want to understand, in which direction to move forward, we want to share ideas and adjust our vision in order to understand what we do wrong. Maybe we should move on to another stage of cooperation with the government bodies, from only monitoring of the implementation of the Strategy and reporting on how it has been done to some additional measures, namely dialogue, cooperation, joint movement, joint developments for implementation of the Strategy. We believe that this document is extremely important for our country,” said Arkadiy Bushchenko in his opening speech.

On behalf of participants of the Action Plan on the Strategy implementation, the UHHRU Executive Director stressed that human rights are fundamental for public administration, are its integral part.

Valeriia Lutkovska, the Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights, said that the visa-free travel with EU member-states depends, in particular, on the state of human rights in Ukraine.

Valeriia Lutkovska (in center)
Valeriia Lutkovska (in center)

“Before taking such a fateful decision for Ukraine, the EU has identified grounds for termination of visa-free travel for any country that has received it. And one of the main grounds is a violation of human rights. For my part, I note that the last six months all delegation of the European institutions asked me questions about the National Human Rights Strategy implementation. I do not know, who would take responsibility and try to lie to European institutions that the National Strategy was performed well,” said Valeriia Lutkovska.

According to her, today, unfortunately, we cannot say that actions envisaged by the National Strategy and the Action Plan have been implemented in full.

According to the Commissioner, one reason for the ineffective implementation of the Action Plan for the National Strategy implementation is a lack of understanding of its importance by public authorities.

Daniel Ryan, Deputy Director of the USAID Democracy and Governance Office, praised the actions of state authorities and the civil society.

“The development, adoption and now implementation of the National Human Rights Strategy and the Action Plan is an unprecedented step that brings Ukraine closer to Europe”, he said.

With micriphone - Daniel Ryan, Deputy Director of the USAID Democracy and Governance Office
With microphone – Daniel Ryan, Deputy Director of the USAID Democracy and Governance Office

Daniel Ryan stressed the need for coordinated joint work in this direction.

“Effective implementation of the National Human Rights Strategy requires a concerted effort, funding from the government and implementation from the Ombudsman’s Office and the civil society – further active participation in monitoring of its implementation, a deep understanding of human rights – from the whole society. For our part, we promise that we will continue to provide technical and expert support in this process”, assured Daniel Ryan.

Oleksandr Sydorenko, Director of the Participant Training Program project of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), spoke about the educational program “Development, monitoring and evaluation of the National Human Rights Strategy and its implementation plan.” The program was to familiarize the participants with the experience of Sweden in order to develop knowledge and skills that are crucial for the development, implementation, and monitoring of the National Human Rights Strategy and the Action Plan, as well as for awareness-raising campaigns on human rights, including educational activities on human rights. Oleksandr Sydorenko awarded certificates to participants of the program.

DSC_3219

The roundtable consisted of several thematic parts. After the presentation, live broadcasting from the Human Rights Secretariat of the Administration of the Government of Georgia took place. Natalia Jaliashvili, Head of Human Rights’ Secretariat of Government Administration, and Ana Khizanishvili, Advisor to Human Rights Secretariat of the Administration of the Government of Georgia, spoke about the experience of the country in implementing the Strategy in the field of human rights, which had been approved by the Parliament of Georgia in 2014. Its action plan had been approved for 2 years. The implementation of the Strategy in Georgia occurs in conjunction with state authorities, civil society organizations and was controlled by the Parliament.

Then there were 4 thematic sessions on various aspects concerning the implementation of the National Strategy.

Session 1. The introduction of experience of Sweden in the human rights strategies implementation.

During the first block, presentations prepared by alumni of the program “Development, monitoring, and evaluation of the national human rights strategy and its implementation plan” of the Participant Training Program project of US Agency for International Development. Participants talked about the experience of Sweden.

Olena Semiorkina, an analyst and expert on law making of UHHRU
Olena Semiorkina, an analyst and expert on law making of UHHRU

Olena Semiorkina, an analyst and expert on law making of UHHRU, described the development and implementation of policies in the field of human rights. The theme of the report was devoted to general problems associated with the protection of human rights in Ukraine and Sweden.

Ivan Yurchik, an expert of The Association of Ukrainian Human Rights Monitors on Law Enforcement, presented a comparative analysis of approaches to the evaluation of the National Human Rights Strategy.

Ivan Yurchik, Alla Blaha (UHHRU) and Tatiana Pechonchyk
Ivan Yurchik, Alla Blaha (UHHRU) and Tatiana Pechonchyk

Mariia Krasnenko, a lawyer of NGO “Donbass SOS”, said about the application experience of Sweden in the integration of refugees into the local community, which was also part of the implementation of the National Human Rights Strategy.

Bohdan Moysa, a coordinator of the analytical unit of UHHRU, presented the report on the implementation of the strategic priorities in human rights at the level of cities. He chose the result of the Swedish city of Västerås as an example. Also, Alla Blaha presented another report of the analytical unit of the Union.

Tatiana Pechonchyk, chairman of the Human Rights Information Centre, told about educational activities and human rights education in Sweden.

Tatiana Pechonchyk, chairman of the Human Rights Information Centre
Tatiana Pechonchyk, chairman of the Human Rights Information Centre

Presentations are available for review at the link.

Session 2. Implementation of the National Human Rights Strategy in local communities.

Participants of the second thematic block were Andrii Halai, coordinator of the ‘Human Rights Passportisation of Areas’ project of UHHRU, and Oleksandr Vinnikov, a member of the supervisory board of the Chamber of Tax Consultants, legal advisor of the Center for International Private Enterprise. Andrii Halai described the concept of local human rights index. His publications on this topic can also be found on his personal blog on our website.

Olena Semiorkina, Oleksandr Vinnikov and Andrii Halai (UHHRU)
Olena Semiorkina, Oleksandr Vinnikov and Andrii Halai (UHHRU)

Oleksandr Vinnikov highlighted issues of freedom of entrepreneurship and the reform of the simplified tax system within the framework of the Association Agreement with the EU.

Session 3. Human rights education. Presentation of best practices.

Serhii Burov, Head of the educational unit of UHHRU, was a speaker of the session. He appreciated the performance of the government action plan in the field of education, including education on the issue of human rights.

Serhii Burov, Head of the educational unit of UHHRU
Serhii Burov, Head of the educational unit of UHHRU

Session 4. Barriers to the National Human Rights Strategy implementation.

The final session summed up the results of the following stage of the implementation of the National Strategy. The following issues were announced:

  • no clear understanding of who and how should carry out the envisaged measures;
  • no budgeting provided;
  • no support from relevant central executive authorities of the Action Plan for implementation of the Strategy.

DSC_3402

At the end of the session, it was suggested to establish a new structure of interaction of monitors and performers of the Action Plan. Namely, the creation of the Coordinating Council, whose functions will include:

  • Coordination of expert groups;
  • Preparation of formal appeals to the heads of central executive bodies and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine in case of failure or threat to the Action Plan;
  • Involvement of expertise;
  • Preparation of proposals to attract donor support;
  • Accumulation of information/training reports;
  • Public presentation of the achievements’ assessment of the strategic directions of the National Strategy and Action Plan;
  • Ensuring constant human rights education work with central executive bodies and local self-governance bodies.

It was also proposed to combine NGO monitors in thematic expert councils, whose main task would be to work with central executive bodies. It will consist of thematic meetings of monitors of the National Strategy performers in central executive bodies and reports every three months. Objectives of the meeting:

  • Expert/technical assistance;
  • Clarification of the barriers to the Action Plan;
  • Review of the Action Plan measures to determine its relevance;
  • Determining whether this measure achieved the result, expected in the Strategy;
  • Assessment of the consistency of all existing programs, plans of measures and action plans together.

The video of the roundtable is available: https://youtu.be/WlE2xxFct_8

The American people, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), have provided economic and humanitarian assistance worldwide for 55years. In Ukraine, USAID’s assistance focuses on three areas: Health and Social Transition, Economic Growth and Democracy and Governance. USAID has provided 1.8 bln. technical and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine since 1992.
For additional information about USAID programs in Ukraine, please visit our website: http://ukraine.usaid.govor our Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/USAIDUkraine.

If you find an error on our site, please select the incorrect text and press ctrl-enter.

May also be useful

Join Us

Let's make a great work together!
Support Become a volunteer Complete training